<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Really Interesting Look at Supernatural Fans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://popculturecurmudgeon.com/2008/02/a-really-interesting-look-at-supernatural-fans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://popculturecurmudgeon.com/2008/02/a-really-interesting-look-at-supernatural-fans/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Pop culture news and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 23:43:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen</title>
		<link>http://popculturecurmudgeon.com/2008/02/a-really-interesting-look-at-supernatural-fans/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 02:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://popculturecurmudgeon.wordpress.com/2008/02/20/a-really-interesting-look-at-supernatural-fans/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Supernatural just has that effect on us girls, and I think it is much more than the attractiveness of the leads. I know that is one of the things I focused on in my post, but I think it has to do with the relationship between the leads and the power of that connection in propelling the story. The fact that the boys don&#039;t hurt the eyes at all helps, but it&#039;s definitely not enough to have drawn us all in so deeply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Supernatural just has that effect on us girls, and I think it is much more than the attractiveness of the leads. I know that is one of the things I focused on in my post, but I think it has to do with the relationship between the leads and the power of that connection in propelling the story. The fact that the boys don&#8217;t hurt the eyes at all helps, but it&#8217;s definitely not enough to have drawn us all in so deeply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://popculturecurmudgeon.com/2008/02/a-really-interesting-look-at-supernatural-fans/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 01:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://popculturecurmudgeon.wordpress.com/2008/02/20/a-really-interesting-look-at-supernatural-fans/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>hi jen, &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;i&#039;ve always had an interest in the paranormal and supernatural world (i guess it&#039;s now categorized as sci-fi) and i&#039;ve never considered myself as freaky. &lt;br/&gt;until &lt;i&gt;supernatural&lt;/i&gt; came along, i have never been totally obsessed with any television show (and i am a baby boomer, which means i have been around, LOL). i never even realized i was a &quot;fangrrl&quot; but am happy to be considered one due to the positive way we are portrayed in the &lt;i&gt;popmatters&lt;/i&gt; article.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;cheers, and enjoy the show tonight!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi jen, </p>
<p>i&#8217;ve always had an interest in the paranormal and supernatural world (i guess it&#8217;s now categorized as sci-fi) and i&#8217;ve never considered myself as freaky. <br />until <i>supernatural</i> came along, i have never been totally obsessed with any television show (and i am a baby boomer, which means i have been around, LOL). i never even realized i was a &#8220;fangrrl&#8221; but am happy to be considered one due to the positive way we are portrayed in the <i>popmatters</i> article.</p>
<p>cheers, and enjoy the show tonight!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

